Focus groups

Unlike in social science research, focus groups in participatory research not only serve to collect data, but are also an essential part of the joint process. They have an additional function for community building and emancipatory effects on the participants. The focus of the analysis is less on the answers to the researchers' questions and more on the interaction and reflection of the participants. In many participatory projects, the focus groups are planned, implemented, documented and analyzed together with the co-researchers from the respective communities being researched.

The method in brief

Focus groups are sometimes used as an independent method, sometimes as a complementary method to previously conducted interviews. Especially in the context of racism, focus groups are well suited to shed light on collective perspectives and dynamics and to discuss and analyze possible courses of action in addition to problem areas. The inclusive and participatory aspect in particular plays a decisive role here, for example when it comes to everyday experiences in the context of healthcare and education of racially marked people. Focus groups offer insight into the discursive negotiation processes and inter-group dynamics, especially when it comes to questions of self-positioning of migrants. This is related to the fact that one difficulty of focus group discussions is building and maintaining the trust of the participants towards the researchers involved and within the groups. This difficulty reflects the fact that focus groups are often spaces for collective and sensitive reflections which, due to their own dynamics, can provide important insights into perspectives, experiences and mechanisms in the context of racism.

Further questions about the method

As focus groups are a collective process, one challenge is to ensure that participants feel safe enough in the social space to interact and respond free from preconceived social expectations. By using various methods by the researchers, such as storytelling or vignette questions, the pressure of "social desirability" can be taken away from the participants.

In addition to the evaluation of the verbatim transcripts, the notes of the co-moderators are also central to the evaluation of the results in order to capture non-verbal communication and inter-group dynamics. The participatory focus group method also offers the opportunity to evaluate the results together with the participants. It is important here to determine the central aspects of the discussion and the participants' attitudes towards these topics, which may also change in the course of the focus group.

Contact persons

Photo Tanja Gangarova

Tanja Gangarova

Research assistant
Dept. Integration &
National Discrimination and Racism Monitor
Photo Felicia Boma Lazaridou

Felicia Boma Lazaridou

Research assistant
Dept. Consensus & Conflict &
National Discrimination and Racism Monitor
Photo Dr. Hans Vogt

Dr. Hans Vogt

Research assistant
Dept. of Integration &
National Discrimination and Racism Monitor
Photo Rosa Burç

Rosa Burç

Research assistant
Dept. Migration &
National Discrimination and Racism Monitor
Photo Esra Yula

Esra Yula

Research assistant
Dept. Migration &
National Discrimination and Racism Monitor