NaDiRa media analyses

In NaDiRa media analyses, we combine (semi-)automated, computer-aided text analyses, manual media content analyses, analyses of social media metrics (e.g. likes, shares, interaction rates) and social network analyses.

NaDiRa media analyses in brief

With the help of (semi-)automated, computer-aided methods of text analysis, increasingly large collections of texts (corpora) can be examined. The focus here is on the identification and quantification of linguistic or textual phenomena. The methods thus allow linguistic patterns, trends and changes to be analyzed.

Although this field has developed rapidly in recent years and allows increasingly complex analyses, computers cannot "understand" texts like humans. This is why the media analyses in NaDiRa are supplemented by manual (qualitative and quantitative) media content analyses. In this process, media content is read by appropriately trained people (so-called coders) and classified (i.e. assigned to the appropriate categories) using a codebook or category system. In principle, they can also cover content that is only hinted at in the text; in addition, the context of the content (e.g. prior thematic knowledge) can also be taken into account.

When analyzing social media metrics, the focus is on the correlations between relevant user interactions (e.g. the number of likes, shares, comments, replies, retweets or the number of page fans and followers) and social media content. Such analyses record how users can interact with content in the first place and what the social media platforms make of it. This is essential for comprehensive social media analyses, as user behavior must not be examined in isolation, but must be understood in its interaction with the "platform architecture" and the decisions of the operators.

Social network analyses make the networking and mobilization potential of social media visible. They are central to the study of social media because the unique selling point of this medium is that it enables the formation, maintenance and expansion of networks. Unlike in editorial media, content often serves as a reason to use a social medium - but it is not the main reason for using social media.

Further questions about the method

One challenge in social science work with computer-assisted methods is to critically examine the possibilities of the methods for their valid application and to keep an eye on possible limitations. Challenges in manual content analyses are (due to the high personnel resources) a clever selection of the material to be examined as well as the time-consuming training of the coders. After all, the results will only be of high quality and meaningful if they classify the media content reliably (i.e. reliably) and validly (i.e. "correctly" in terms of content). Above all, analyses of social media metrics must take into account the media logic of the medium under investigation, as the interaction options provided, such as liking, sharing or commenting, are designed differently by the platform operators. The analysis of networks in social media poses a challenge, as this is an investigation of the networking between user profiles or content on social media, rather than social actors. Such profiles do not necessarily correspond to social actors that exist offline. These include, for example, online communities or chatbots.

Especially in their combination, text and media content analyses can describe patterns and trends in media content on the one hand across very large amounts of data and on the other hand for selected time periods or content in a more in-depth and interpretative way.
When interpreting the results of computer-aided methods, particular attention should be paid to the validation of the results. Since a strictly representative selection of media content is difficult to achieve even with a clever selection of material, attention should always be paid to generalizability when interpreting manual content analyses.

Analyses in digital platforms must always bear in mind that this is a socio-technical process that is not only controlled by users, but is also influenced by automated factors such as algorithmic content recommendations. The results show how content is shaped, distributed, exaggerated or downplayed within a specific online environment, how social actors can be networked and mobilized around this content and how different actors act for different reasons to popularize and (de)legitimize content.

Contact persons

Tom Runge, Researcher

Tom Runge

Researcher